Hello, Here's a follow-up about mocks in the qa tests. I prepared example
use of Turtle library. My observations below: - integrates easily with
Boost.Test (HippoMocks didn't require any integration, gmock will be
harder, gitlab.com gitlab.com ) - looks similar in use to google mocks -
it's maintained on GitHub: github.com github.com - it forced me to create
more mocks than HippoMocks and rework the code a bit ( gitlab.com gitlab.com ),
so: - may require more work to create/maintain tests - but I believe that
in exchange it will result in better quality (I found missing 'virtual'
keyword before destructor of SCHEMATIC!) Best regards, Sylwester Dnia 21
stycznia 2021 16:38 Jeff Young <j...@rokeby.ie> napisał(a): Good point.
I have only used the Java one (which I guess is the original?). Cheers,
Jeff. On 20 Jan 2021, at 21:18, Sylwester Kocjan < s.koc...@o2.pl >
wrote: Hi Jeff, Did you use github.com github.com or that one for Java
github.com github.com ? Mockitopp has it's last code update about ~1,5
year ago, so it looks it has the same downside as HippoMocks. There is also
Mockpp, also not actively developed: sourceforge.net sourceforge.net BR, SK
Dnia 17 stycznia 2021 16:45 Jeff Young < j...@rokeby.ie > napisał(a):
I’ve used Mockito. Can’t say I remember a thing about it, though (which could
be good?). Cheers, Jeff. On 17 Jan 2021, at 14:49, Sylwester Kocjan <
s.koc...@o2.pl > wrote: Hello, On 17/01/2021 09:47, Alex wrote: >
...GTest, Doctest and Catch2, (...) they'll all get the job
done They are all testing frameworks without mocking capability. We
have already Boost.Test based tests and I find it unnecessary
effort to migrate them, and alone they don't solve the problem.
On 17/01/2021 09:47, Alex wrote: > I wasn't aware that GMock could
operate separately from
GTest, but if it can, that's pretty neat. On Sun, Jan 17, 2021,
12:15 AM Andrew Lutsenko <anlutse...@gmail.com> wrote: > You can
also use gmock separately from gtest. Since some time gmock is a part of
gtest. Any search results in
the topic of gmock with another testing frameworks are quite old.
I think there is a risk that it will not work. On 17/01/2021 09:47,
Alex wrote: > Catch is a single header I was instructed to avoid
introducing new dependencies, hence my
initial choice of single-header HippoMocks: gitlab.com gitlab.com On
Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 6:47 AM Seth Hillbrand <s...@kipro-pcb.com>
wrote: > The downside of HippoMocks from what I can gather is that the
project appears abandoned. Sadly, this is true. There are also other
choices, but I don't
have any hands-on experience with them and I don't know which one
to choose: - turtle.sourceforge.net turtle.sourceforge.net -
github.com github.com - github.com github.com Best regards, Sylwester
On 17/01/2021 09:47, Alex wrote: I've used GTest, Doctest and Catch2, and
they'll all get
the job done; Doctest is definitely the fastest to compile,
but also has the least of features; Catch and GTest have the
most features. I wasn't aware that GMock could operate
separately from GTest, but if it can, that's pretty neat. I
believe Doctest and Catch both are single
header - I know at least Catch is a single header; but I think
it makes sense to use a git submodule in this case. On Sun, Jan
17, 2021,
12:15 AM Andrew Lutsenko < anlutse...@gmail.com >
wrote: I would also suggest to look towards
gtest/gmock. It's widely adopted, works with cmake out of
the
box, has integrations with popular IDEs and a good
choice of supporting tools like parallelized runners,
GUI inspectors etc. You can also use gmock separately from
gtest. Andrew On Sat, Jan 16, 2021
at 6:47 AM Seth Hillbrand < s...@kipro-pcb.com >
wrote: Hi Sylwester- I haven't used HippoMocks but in
general,
adding QA tests is always welcome as long as they
run as expected under the Fedora docker we use for
online QA with GitLab. The downside of HippoMocks from
what I can
gather is that the project appears abandoned. If
I'm incorrect here, can you link to the current
repository/documentation? Thanks- Seth On Fri, Jan
15,
2021 at 2:49 PM Sylwester Kocjan < s.koc...@o2.pl
>
wrote: Hello, I have two questions regarding QA code
for
KiCad and I'd like to ask for your comments
about them: 1. I reviewed contents of qa directory in
KiCad repo and I saw some issues that can be
fixed. Could you please take a look at the
summary and let me know if they are valid:
docs.google.com docs.google.com 2. What do you think about adding mocking
library to the KiCad code? I found that PGM
object is mocked few times gitlab.com gitlab.com
A libary for creating mocks would simplify
creting the tests. In this MR and commit:
gitlab.com gitlab.com gitlab.com gitlab.com there is added
HippoMocks, a single-header
mocking tool and it does it's job. If
that's ok, it could help to get rid of
these duplicated mocks (maybe even hand-written
mocks at all). Best regards, Sylwester
______________________________ Mailing list: launchpad.net launchpad.net
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchp Unsubscribe : launchpad.net
launchpad.net More help : help.launchpad.net help.launchpad.net --
Seth Hillbrand Lead Developer +1-530-302-5483 Long Beach, CA
www.kipro-pcb.com www.kipro-pcb.com i...@kipro-pcb.com
______________________________ Mailing list: launchpad.net launchpad.net
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchp Unsubscribe : launchpad.net
launchpad.net More help : help.launchpad.net help.launchpad.net
______________________________ Mailing list: launchpad.net launchpad.net
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchp Unsubscribe : launchpad.net
launchpad.net More help : help.launchpad.net help.launchpad.net
______________________________ list: launchpad.net launchpad.net
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchp
Unsubscribe : launchpad.net launchpad.net
More help : help.launchpad.net help.launchpad.net
______________________________ Mailing list: launchpad.net launchpad.net
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchp Unsubscribe : launchpad.net
launchpad.net More help : help.launchpad.net help.launchpad.net
______________________________ Mailing list: launchpad.net launchpad.net
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchp Unsubscribe : launchpad.net
launchpad.net More help : help.launchpad.net help.launchpad.net
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
