I just took the old description that was there before. A much better one would be:
Remove declarations of kvm_*_pit() on architectures who do not support not have a PIT. That is what I was really intending. It removes a lot of compile warnings, when compiling anything with libkvm.h on platforms that do not have a pit. It's mainly because of the structures that are used as arguments to these function declrations. On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 17:24 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Jerone Young wrote: > > - I am resending this patch removing ia64. It apprently fell through > > the cracks. > > > > Don't compile kvm_*_pit() on architectures whose currently supported > > platforms do not contain a PIT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > diff --git a/libkvm/libkvm.h b/libkvm/libkvm.h > > --- a/libkvm/libkvm.h > > +++ b/libkvm/libkvm.h > > @@ -549,6 +549,7 @@ int kvm_pit_in_kernel(kvm_context_t kvm) > > > > #ifdef KVM_CAP_PIT > > > > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) > > /*! > > * \brief Get in kernel PIT of the virtual domain > > * > > @@ -569,6 +570,7 @@ int kvm_get_pit(kvm_context_t kvm, struc > > * \param s PIT state of the virtual domain > > */ > > int kvm_set_pit(kvm_context_t kvm, struct kvm_pit_state *s); > > +#endif > > > > #endif > > Patch is okay, but doesn't match the description at all. Is this what > you intended to send? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
