On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2008, Javier Guerra wrote: > > What about Lua? (http://www.lua.org) > > > > it started up as a configuration language, and evolved into a full > > programming language, while remaining _very_ light (less than 200K > > with all libraries), and wonderfully easy to embed into C programs. > > Okay, so much for the upsides. Now for the downsides: a language that > nearly nobody knows, for something that is not meant to be executed (think > security implications).
when embedded, you get to choose what libraries are available. there are several examples of fairly secure settings. personally, i find shell scripts enough for setting up parameters. a static config wouldn't bring much advantages. -- Javier ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
