Avi Kivity wrote: > Not so fast... the patch updates the flood count to 5. Can you check > if a lower value still works? Also, whether updating the flood count to > 5 (without the rest of the patch) works? > > Unconditionally bumping the flood count to 5 will likely cause a > performance regression on other guests.
I put the flood count back to 3, and the RHEL3 guest performance is even better. > > While I was able to see excessive flooding, I couldn't reproduce your > kscand problem. Running /bin/true always returned immediately for me. A poor attempt at finding a simplistic, minimal re-create. The use case I am investigating has over 500 processes/threads with a base memory consumption around 1GB. I was finding it nearly impossible to have a generic re-create of the problem for you to use in your investigations on CentOS. Thanks for the patch. david ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
