On Wednesday 14 May 2008 16:11:39 Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Wednesday 14 May 2008 16:06:00 Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > In > > fact, in the case of soft breakpoints, KVM doesn't even know where all the > > set breakpoints are. > > Side note: I'm retract this sentence: I wrote it before I sketched out the > pseudocode, and forgot to remove it. :)
Er no, let me try that again: In my proposed design, the stub needs to know where all breakpoints are, HW or SW. (That means it must implement Z0/Z1.) However, KVM itself doesn't need to know any of that: all breakpoints are referred to the stub for handling, and the stub will notify KVM if further action is needed in-kernel. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
