Dor Laor schrieb: (...)
>>> FWIW, virtio-net is much better with my patches applied. The difference >>> between the e1000 and virtio-net is that e1000 consumes almost twice as >>> much CPU as virtio-net so in my testing, the performance improvement >>> with virtio-net is about 2x. We were loosing about 20-30% throughput >>> because of the delays in handling incoming packets. >> Do you by chance have any recent numbers on disk performance (i.e., Windows >> guest vs Linux host)? >> >> > > At the moment there is no pv block driver for Windows guests. (there is > for linux) > You can use scsi for windows, it should perform well. How well, when compared to "bare metal"? Or when compared to a Linux guest with a pv block driver? Do you have any numbers? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
