Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:03:48PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 09:43:40PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> On 04/29/2010 09:09 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>>> You missed quadrant on 4mb large page emulation with shadow (see updated
>>>>> patch below).
>>>> Good catch.
>>>>
>>>>> Also for some reason i can't understand the assumption
>>>>> does not hold for large sptes with TDP, so reverted for now.
>>>> It's unrelated to TDP, same issue with shadow. I think the
>>>> calculation is correct. For example the 4th spte for a level=2 page
>>>> will yield gfn=4*512.
>>> Under testing i see sp at level 2, with sp->gfn == 4096, mmu_set_spte
>>> setting index 8 to gfn 4096 (whereas kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn returns 4096 +
>>> 8*512).
>>>
>>> Lai, can you please take a look at it? You should see the
>>> kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn BUG_ON by using -mem-path on hugetlbfs.
>>>
>> Could you tell me how you test it? It will be better if I follow
>> your test steps.
>
> mount -t hugetlbfs none /mnt/
> echo xyz > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> qemu-kvm parameters -mem-path /mnt/
>
>> I also hit the kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn BUG_ON, It is because
>> FNAME(fetch)() set sp->gfn wrong. The patch:
>> [PATCH] kvm: calculate correct gfn for small host pages which emulates large
>> guest pages
>> fix it.
>>
>> I can not hit kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn BUG_ON after this patch also
>> applied.
>>
>> So could you tell me your test steps:
>> The host: ept/npt enabled? 64bit? testing codes in host?
>
> Intel EPT enabled.
>
>> The guest: OS? PAE? 32bit? 64bit? testing codes in guest?
>
> FC12 guest.
>
I forgot to check if the calculation of base gfn is correct
in __direct_map().
Subject: [PATCH] kvm, tdp: calculate correct base gfn for non-DIR level
the base gfn calculation is incorrect in __direct_map(),
it does not calculate correctly when level=3 or 4.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index a5c6719..6986a6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1955,7 +1956,10 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v,
int write,
}
if (*iterator.sptep == shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte) {
- pseudo_gfn = (iterator.addr & PT64_DIR_BASE_ADDR_MASK)
>> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ u64 base_addr = iterator.addr;
+
+ base_addr &= PT64_LVL_ADDR_MASK(iterator.level);
+ pseudo_gfn = base_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, pseudo_gfn, iterator.addr,
iterator.level - 1,
1, ACC_ALL, iterator.sptep);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
