Am 25.08.2012 22:22, schrieb Andrew: > 25.08.2012 23:02, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >> Am 25.08.2012 21:47, schrieb Andrew: >>> 25.08.2012 22:30, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>>> Am 25.08.2012 21:20, schrieb Andrew: >>>>> 25.08.2012 22:12, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>>>>> Am 25.08.2012 17:29, schrieb Andrew: >>>>>>> 25.08.2012 18:21, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>>>>>>> Am 25.08.2012 16:53, schrieb Andrew: >>>>>>>>> Hi all. >>>>>>>>> Now we have separate mawk package. At same time, there is a busybox >>>>>>>>> awk >>>>>>>>> implementation. >>>>>>>>> So I have a question: do we really have a separate AWK? And what >>>>>>>>> difference between mawk and busybox awk? At >>>>>>>>> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/29576/difference-between-gawk-vs-awk >>>>>>>>> I saw opinion that bb awk is richer in features than mawk... >>>>>>>> Doing a quick I haven't found a feature comparision between busbox awk >>>>>>>> and mawk, any the link above reads: >>>>>>>> "richer in features than *n*awk" >>>>>>> Right. But gawk seems to have richer feature list than mawk. From other >>>>>>> side, mawk seems to be a bit faster - but not too much, and in our case >>>>>>> we haven't a huge awk programs in distro, so speed isn't too critical. >>>>>>>> Don't no if it will be an easy transition from mawk to bb awk... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> kp >>>>>>> I think that it'll be enough just to enable awk in busybox... >>>>>> Of course :) >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll try this. >>>>>> Ok, >>>>>> >>>>>> but I guess it needs a lot of testing - packages that requires mawk are >>>>>> iptables, webconf and openswan - and adjusting esp. the last one is IMHO >>>>>> no fun. >>>>>> >>>>>> kp >>>>>> >>>>> I'll add changes into next branch; I'll not remove mawk.lrp, just remove >>>>> it from dependencies. So anybody can test it's work, and, if needed, >>>>> load mawk to ensure that bug is provided by busybox. >>>> Ok, >>>> can we please make shure that this change(s) will be kept in next >>>> (whereas the upnpd build fix shoud go to master), so we don't mess up a >>>> mostly stable alpha version? >>>> I'm shure it'll take some time until someone tests openswan :( >>> We can leave dependency on mawk for openswan in alpha. Or make note that >>> if somebody expects troubles or want to speedup ohenswan he may load >>> mawk.lrp >> So mawk will simply overwrite bb awk?
Responding to myself; it does. Should make testing a bit easier. kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
