Rick Stanley
Constitutional Activist
Phone: 303-329-0481
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
We the People Scoop 2/05/06
======================================================================
WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!                      **
**  Visit the offshore website at:                                  **
**  http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org                        **
**  Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!                **
**                                                                  **
**  SPECIAL NOTICE: Many of our readers know that the Scooplist has **
**  been down for just over a month. Our previous site at           **
**  www.stanley2002.org was just closed down by the Powers That Be  **
**  that do not want to see this kind of info coming out.           **
======================================================================
 
OPINION RELEASE: Another Story
 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sherry Peel Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
My name is Todd-Ellis; Swanson.  For those who don't know me I was a CPA
from November 1995 until December 30, 2005.  I was trained about 5 years ago
by another CPA, Tom Schauf, www.bankhonesty.com
<http://www.bankhonesty.com/>  to be an expert witness regarding bank loans,
specifically, whether the bank actually loaned you any of their money when
you got your mortgage loan or car loan.  Tom is the author of America's
Hope: To Cancel Your Bank Loans Without Going To Court, The American Voters
vs. The Banking System and Top Secret Banker's Manual.  I will explain this
banking system by briefly summarizing the 6 page banking letter I have
provided to people who have requested it, to trustees who have requested it
on behalf of trusts and then tell you what has happened to me for exposing
the truth.  Regardless of what has happened or may happen, it is my
conviction as a Christian that I am to obey God and leave the consequences
to Him.
 
 
 
When a bank makes a loan they must follow Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP).  Title 12 of the United States Code, ยง 1831n (a) requires
all Federally-insured (FDIC) banks to follow GAAP.  GAAP requires the use of
double entry bookkeeping journal entries.  Double entry bookkeeping journal
entries work like this.  When a bank accepts cash, checks, negotiable
instruments, promissory notes, or any other similar instruments from a
customer and deposits or records the instruments as an asset, they must
record an offsetting liability that matches the asset they accepted from the
customer.  The liability shows they owe the customer the money they accepted
from the customer.
 
 
 
You see, money is not limited to just cash.  Money is anything that has
value and banks or people accept as money and money does not have to be
issued by the government per Federal Reserve Bank of New York publication I
bet you thought. by David H. Friedman Fourth Edition 1984.  Page 9 explains
that cash and checkbook money have equal value.  Page 27 explains that the
banks create new money by depositing IOU's, promissory notes, offset by a
bank liability called a checking account balance.  Page 5 says, "Money
doesn't have to be intrinsically valuable, be issued by a government or be
in any special form.".  Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago publication Modern
Money Mechanics by Anne Marie L. Gonczy, revised June 1992, shows standard
bookkeeping entries from pages 7 to 33 proving that money is recorded as a
bank asset and a bank liability is evidence of money a bank owes.  The
bookkeeping entries prove that banks accept cash, checks, drafts and
promissory notes as money deposited to create checkbook money, which are
bank liabilities, which show that the bank owes money to the one who
deposited money at the bank.  Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas publication
Money and Banking page 11 explains that when banks grant loans, they create
new money.  The new money, new "loan becomes a new deposit, just like a
paycheck does."  Modern Money Mechanics page 6 says, "What they do when they
make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange (an exchange or swap is
not a loan) for credits to the borrowers' transaction accounts" (emphasis
added).  Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago publication Two Faces of Debt by
Anne Marie L. Gonczy and Timothy P. Schilling, revised September 1992,
discusses how deposit liabilities arise.  Page 19 says, "But a depositor's
balance also rises when the depository institution extends credit-either by
granting a loan to or buying securities from the depositor.  In exchange for
the note or security, the lending or investing institution credits the
depositor's account or gives a check that can be deposited at yet another
depository institution.  In this case, no one else loses a deposit (at that
point in time) (emphasis added).  The total of currency and checkable
deposits-the money supply-is increased.  New money has been brought into
existence by expansion of depository institution credit" (emphasis added).
 
 
 
So what happened is the bank accepted your promissory note as money and
deposited the money/promissory note into a checking account with your name
on the checking account without disclosing this to you.  This means that the
bank recorded the promissory note as a loan from you to the bank.  When the
bank deposited your $100,000 promissory note into a checking account, the
bank created $100,000 of new bank credit money (the bank did not loan money,
they loaned the credit of the bank). I believe the bank, either out of
ignorance or deceit, concealed the substance of the transaction, the
bookkeeping entries, that would prove you were the lender and the bank was
the borrower and the bank uses the form, the promissory note, to try and
convince you that the opposite occurred and that you were the borrower and
not the lender.
 
 
 
For those interested in learning more, I unreservedly recommend reading the
books Money1 and The New Economic Disorder2.
 
 
 
1.  Ewart, James E.  Money.  Seattle, Wash.: Principia Publishing, 1998.
 (ISBN 0-9663570-0-0.)
 
 
 
2.  Bates, Larry.  The New Economic Disorder.  Lake Mary, Florida:  Creation
House, 1994.
 
 (ISBN 0-8841938-3-7.)
 
 
 
 
 
In June, 2004 I received several letters from the SC Board of Accountancy
(Board) concerning complaints that had been filed against my CPA license by
several bank attorneys.  These same complaints were also filed against my NC
license.  The Board requested I provide them with all the documentation I
had to support what I stated in my letters.  I provided the Board with that
information.  One year latter I was subpoenaed to appear for a hearing
before the Board.  That hearing was postponed until October 27, 2005.
 
 
 
The hearing lasted approximately 12 hours.  The transcript is 376 pages.  I
provided 24 exhibits containing approximately 189 pages and I had more
exhibits to submit had there been more time.  Of the exhibits, 25 pages were
from 3 college level Accounting/Economic/Banking textbooks; 21 pages were
from 2 college level history books; 38 pages were from 3 Federal Reserve
Bank Publications; 31 pages were from 2 Continuing Professional Educations
courses I took on Bank Auditing and Accounting; and 8 pages were from the
Congressional Record.   I was told secondhand that the board reached their
decision TO REVOKE MY LICENSE FOR 3 YEARS in less than 30 minutes.  No one
rebutted the exhibits, I relied upon for the details in my letter, during
the hearing and the exhibits were not rebutted in the Final Order.  In fact,
the exhibits are never mentioned and yet it takes a close scrutiny of the
exhibits to understand and grasp the subject matter as it relates to the
information in my letter.  The Final Order doesn't even reflect what
actually took place on the record.
 
 
 
Between the date of the hearing and December 30th when the Final Order was
signed, evidence has been gathered that would suggest my due process rights
were violated and that the Board was biased for several reasons I am
currently not able to discuss.
 
 
 
I have been fighting this battle for 18 months now and I will be appealing,
next week, the Board's Final Order to revoke my CPA license for 3 years.  To
properly put forward my case on appeal I will need a new attorney who is
familiar with employment and administrative law. The time and attorney fees
have been a huge drain on my finances. I have never asked for money to fight
this battle these last 18 months because I had the funds to fight it.
However, I do not have the funds to hire a new attorney for the appeals
process.  Can I file the appeal without an attorney?  Yes.  Am I able to
properly defend myself and put forward my case without an attorney?  No.
Any financial help and/or prayers would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you.
 
 
 
Todd Swanson
 
c/o  111 Mountainside Way
 
Greenville, So.Car.  29609
 
======================================================================
Disclaimer: Information shared in the We The People Scoop is not necessarily
the opinion of the editor or staff.  It is shared for information
purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
======================================================================
Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
We the People Scoop
http://www.stanley2002.org (Down currently but will also be recreated offshore)
http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Listen to: Standing Up for America Radio Show with Rick Stanley
Every Sunday, 6pm MST for 1 hour
On Truth Radio Network
to listen, click here: http://www.truthradio.com
Sponsored by:
Stanley Fasteners and Shop Supply http://www.stanleyfasteners.com
 
Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!
 
 
This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
rights."
 
Subscribe by sending email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Also see our main website at:
http://www.therevco.org
 

To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address, send to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is usually ignored....
 

 


SPONSORED LINKS
Libertarian Libertarian party


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to