Regarding 2): This refers to the norm of the "Riesz representor" of the output, which is otherwise referred to as the dual of the output.
Regarding 1): You can implement whatever you need for your case, and you can extend the code as needed... The main issue is to have a clear idea of what you want to implement and then you should be able to do it either using the already available code, or by extending the code in a simple way (by sub-classing the relevant classes). Best regards, David On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:16 PM 강신성 <ss.k...@pusan.ac.kr> wrote: > Hello, all. > > > I have a question about a non-compliant output problem in libMesh. > > I look into "rb_evaluation.C" and found that there is a code such that > *"RB_output_error_bounds[n] > = abs_error_bound * eval_output_dual_norm(n, mu);" *in line 292. > > > My questions are: > > 1) Can we address a non-compliant output problem in libMesh? > > 2) In the above code, is it correct that "eval_output_dual_norm(n, mu)*"* > is > the dual norm of the *dual* residual? > > > I look forward to hearing from you. > > Best regards, > > > > Shinseong Kang > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Shinseong Kang > Graduate Student > Pusan National University, South Korea > > Tel.: +82-51-510-3052 > H.P.: +82-10-9770-6595 > E-mail: ss.k...@pusan.ac.kr > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-users mailing list > Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users > _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
