Hi Joel, Joel Madero wrote on 26-11-15 02:31: > If QA members just bisected each regression (fully bisect) and > prioritized correctly I *honestly* believe that the regression count > would fall. I don't understand why this point is being ignored as it's > literally *completely* in our control.
Sorry to say that I'm afraid that I can't support you in that believe. Not at the moment. In the early days, there was the meme that we needed good bug reports. Then that changed to good sample documents; tThen finding the first affected version; and now bibisecting. Don't get me wrong: I don't say that good QA is very important. But currently I think that doing proper triage on all partly triaged and unconfirmed bugs would only increase the number of unresolved regressions :) Ciao, Cor -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org - volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
