On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 16:24 -0400, Patrick wrote: > > If I offer two streams what's to stop the business from using the > non-commercial version? > > > > Most businesses will not like the idea of selling or modifying gpl > > software so they'll be open to paying for a different license to be > > used and in that contract you can include the clause that credit to > > you must be displayed in the user interface. > > > > I am not so special that they have to go to me. > > I do appreciate the feedback, sorry if this is too negative. This > thread > is really a last ditch effort. I don't want to go closed source but > FSF > licences don't work for me. I am hoping to find another source > included > license that will work.
You have said above that you're concerned about companies violating your license. They can violate your license no matter what it is. A free license can't prevent people from violating the license. A non-free license can't prevent people from violating the license. As such, no license will "work for you," because you seem to have goals that are not solvable by software licenses. -- Sent from Ubuntu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part