I think so too. Does anyone have an opinion against this? I'll probably have some time this week or next weekend to work on it.
Br's, Marius On Sep 13, 2:59 pm, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote: > A synthetic file sounds good to me and would probably be preferable. > > Cheers, Tim > > On 13 Sep 2009, at 20:31, marius d. wrote: > > > That looks a little cleaner but we'll have to look more into it if > > we'd want to go on this path. Perhaps accumulate those function into > > synthetic js file .. we'll see --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
