Why not lift-core = (lift-common, lift-util, lift-json, lift- actor,lift-webkit) ?
Br's, Marius On Oct 3, 7:33 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri <indraj...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/10/09 6:25 PM, David Pollak wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri > > <indraj...@gmail.com <mailto:indraj...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Oct 2, 5:39 pm, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com > > <mailto:feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri > > > <indraj...@gmail.com <mailto:indraj...@gmail.com>>wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > Following up from the previous round, I am summarizing what we > > > > discussed so far with an attempt to converge and move on to impl. > > > > Would be keen to have feedback and possibly arrive at some > > resolution > > > > on the outstanding items. (Meaty stuff below the module structure) > > > > > liftweb > > > > > - lift-core [H] > > > > - lift-base [J] > > > > - lift-util [J] > > > > - lift-actor > > > > - lift-json > > > > - lift-webkit [K] > > > > > - lift-persistence > > > > - lift-mapper > > > > - lift-record > > > > - lift-jpa > > > > > - lift-modules [L] > > > > - lift-testkit > > > > - lift-osgi > > > > - lift-wizard > > > > - lift-widgets > > > > - lift-machine > > > > - lift-textile > > > > - lift-facebook > > > > - lift-amqp > > > > - lift-xmpp > > > > - lift-openid > > > > - lift-oauth > > > > - lift-paypal > > > > - lift-jta > > > > > - lift-archetypes > > > > - ... > > > > > - lift-examples [M] > > > > - ... > > > > > - lift-site > > > > > - lift-resources [N] > > > > - lift-root-model > > > > - lift-site-skin > > > > - lift-installer > > > > - misc config resources (scaladoc, javadoc etc.) > > > > > Resolved since: > > > > > [A] lift-* prefix is fine/preferred for top level categories > > (dir_name > > > > == artifactId) [Heiko] > > > > > [B] For Lift users not using Maven these *-all.jars will be > > valuable. > > > > Assembly preferred to meta [Heiko] > > > > > [C] lift-testkit to move to lift-modules. Applications would use it > > > > under 'test' scope. [David] > > > > > [D] lift-json to be part of core [Marius] > > > > > [E] lift-persistence being separated from lift-core into it's own > > > > category and made optional [Marius] > > > > > [F] No deep nesting within modules (no submodules) for now [Heiko] > > > > > [G] Presentations and docs to be in central repository for now > > > > [+1:David/Tim/Derek, +0:Indrajit, -1:Heiko/Viktor]. > > > > Settling for central repo at the moment (a: least change, b: in a > > > > hurry to converge, c: effect of living in largest democracy in the > > > > world!). Later on, I'll attempt to make this part of site > > build and > > > > make them more conveniently available. > > > > > Outstanding since: > > > > > [H] lift-core has to get a better and more appropriate name > > (and also > > > > to avoid confusion since lift-core == 'everything lift' at the > > > > moment). > > > > Starting with two that come to my mind. > > > > - lift-lite (Members of this category make up the lightweight, > > > > minimalistic Lift distribution that would help you build a Lift > > based > > > > application) > > > > - lift-genesis (Members of this category make up the genesis of > > > > your Lift based application) > > > > - lift-mini (Minimal Lift distribution to get started with Lift) > > > > - lift-minimal (Same as above) > > > > How about lift-web (the stuff you need to build a web application) > > > Hmm, lift-web vs lift-web/lift-webkit could add to confusion. Too many > > combination of lift+web (liftweb.net <http://liftweb.net>, lift-web, > > lift-webkit) for > > comfort. > > > okay. > > Now that lift-base is free for grab, I am settling for lift-base for > lack of any other clear winner. > > So we have lift-base = (lift-common, lift-util, lift-json, lift-actor, > lift-webkit) > > Feel free to comment in favor or against (vote/veto) if someone has a > better option popping up. > > > > > > > > > [J] lift-base, lift-util needs more unambiguous names. > > > > - lift-base -> lift-common [+1:Naftoli/Derek/Stuart/Marius/Tim/ > > > > Heiko/Viktor, +0:Indrajit -1:DavidB (very strong)] But still > > good to > > > > have even better option. > > > > +1 for lift-common, but I'm not wedded to the name. > > > > > - lift-util -> lift-util (no change) [+1:Marius/David (status > > > > quo)] > > > > I'm going to mandate that this not change. The cost of changing > > is too high > > > and the value to changing is minimal. > > > > > - lift-util -> lift-webutil > > [+1:Naftoli/Derek/Stuart/Indrajit/Tim/ > > > > Heiko/Viktor] > > > > Veto. > > > Fair do. let's settle for lift-common and lift-util for now. > > <snip/> > > Cheers, Indrajit --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
