Whilst we are talking about Props, I wouldn't mind seeing a level of abstraction on Props so that it can load stuff from things other than .props files. For instance, Im using configgy more and more these days as its much more preferable to properties files for app configuration.
Anyone got any thoughts on this? Cheers, Tim On 22 Feb 2010, at 18:34, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:13 PM, David Pollak > <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've closed Jeppe's ticket. Why? >> >> WebKit depends on util. Props (where the runmode is defined) is in util, so >> there would be a circular reference if LiftRules was used to calculate the >> runmode. >> >> Further, util can be used outside of the context of WebKit/Boot. We want to >> encourage that. > > Fair point. I keep forgetting about those other uses :-) > > /Jeppe > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
