On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:21:44 +0100, Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
> It sounds reasonable to drop the current abc2ly implementation. However, > I think we shouldn't do this without somehow including abc2xml in the > distribution and (probably) create a wrapper script abc2ly that > transparently replaces the old implementation and calls abc2xml | > musicxml2ly instead. Sounds like simple and effective to me. -- Johan _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
