On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, James Harkins <jamshar...@gmail.com> wrote: > At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400, > Brett McCoy wrote: >> I've used both the emacs lilypond mode and Frescobaldi. I like the >> emacs mode because, well, it's emacs, but in the end, though, I think >> I prefer using Frescobaldi just because it has more music-related >> features than emacs... > > Oh, right... I forgot, I used the transpose feature in Frescobaldi just > today. I would miss that in lilypond-mode. Yeah, that pretty much makes my > decision... I like emacs but convenience is convenience.
Frescobaldi 2.0 (currently in development) looks to have some nice features, notably: no KDE dependencies, more cross-platform support and better integration/interaction between PDF output and lilypond code -- Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.electricminstrel.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world." -- Jelaleddin Rumi _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user