reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
On 11/07/2013 07:15 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Even if it's "definitely" btrfs at this point,
btrfs_scan_one_device could fail for other reasons.
Check the return value, warn if it fails, and skip
the device register.
Resolves-Coverity-CID: 1125925
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sand...@redhat.com>
---
utils.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index 8471148..ecacc29 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -1937,6 +1937,7 @@ int test_skip_this_disk(char *path)
int btrfs_scan_lblkid(int update_kernel)
{
int fd = -1;
+ int ret;
u64 num_devices;
struct btrfs_fs_devices *tmp_devices;
blkid_dev_iterate iter = NULL;
@@ -1965,8 +1966,14 @@ int btrfs_scan_lblkid(int update_kernel)
printf("ERROR: could not open %s\n", path);
continue;
}
- btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, path, &tmp_devices,
+ ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, path, &tmp_devices,
&num_devices, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
+ if (ret) {
+ printf("ERROR: could not scan %s\n", path);
+ close (fd);
+ continue;
+ }
+
close(fd);
if (update_kernel)
btrfs_register_one_device(path);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
