On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:51:53PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > @@ -753,6 +754,19 @@ struct btrfs_workqueue_struct > *btrfs_alloc_workqueue(char *name, > } > } > > + if (high_name) { > + ret->high_wq = alloc_workqueue(high_name, > + flags | WQ_HIGHPRI, > + max_active);
I'd really like to add the btrfs- prefix of the workqueue. Quoting our previous discussion: > > * the thread names lost the btrfs- prefix, this makes it hard to > > identify the processes and we want this, either debugging or > > performance monitoring > Yes, that's right. > But the problem is, even I added "btrfs-" prefix to the wq, > the real work executor is kernel workers without any prefix. > Still hard to debugging due to the workqueue mechanism. AFAICS the string passed down to alloc_workqueue ends up in the process name, this is what I'm expecing and don't understand what do you mean. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html