On 25-02-2007 10:08, Simon Arlott wrote:
> This happens on every boot if more information is needed:
> 
> [   37.393715] =================================
> [   37.393830] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> [   37.393881] 2.6.21-rc1-git #146
> [   37.393929] ---------------------------------
> [   37.393979] inconsistent {softirq-on-R} -> {in-softirq-W} usage.
> [   37.394040] hotplug/1072 [HC0[0]:SC1[2]:HE1:SE0] takes:
> [   37.394092]  (&ndev->lock){-+-?}, at: [<b04a7944>] 
> ipv6_add_addr+0x164/0x1e0
> [   37.394308] {softirq-on-R} state was registered at:
> [   37.394359]   [<b013fc42>] __lock_acquire+0x622/0xbb0
> [   37.394515]   [<b0140652>] lock_acquire+0x62/0x80
> [   37.394678]   [<b0511c65>] _read_lock+0x35/0x50
> [   37.394834]   [<b050e200>] sctp_v6_copy_addrlist+0x30/0xc0
...

[SCTP] ipv6: inconsistent lock state ipv6_add_addr/sctp_v6_copy_addrlist

lockdep found that dev->lock taken from softirq in ipv6_add_addr
is also taken in sctp_v6_copy_addrlist with softirqs enabled, so
lockup is possible.

Noticed-by: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---

diff -Nurp linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2-/net/sctp/ipv6.c 
linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/net/sctp/ipv6.c
--- linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2-/net/sctp/ipv6.c       2007-02-21 19:46:49.000000000 
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-mm2/net/sctp/ipv6.c        2007-03-07 21:57:37.000000000 
+0100
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static void sctp_v6_copy_addrlist(struct
                return;
        }
 
-       read_lock(&in6_dev->lock);
+       read_lock_bh(&in6_dev->lock);
        for (ifp = in6_dev->addr_list; ifp; ifp = ifp->if_next) {
                /* Add the address to the local list.  */
                addr = t_new(struct sctp_sockaddr_entry, GFP_ATOMIC);
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static void sctp_v6_copy_addrlist(struct
                }
        }
 
-       read_unlock(&in6_dev->lock);
+       read_unlock_bh(&in6_dev->lock);
        rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to