Hi Marc,

On 27/10/2017 16:28, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Since when updating the properties one LPI at a time, there is no
Since we update the properties one LPI at a time, ... ?
> need to perform an INV each time we read one. Instead, we rely
> on the final VINVALL that gets sent to the ITS to do the work.
The commit message is not crystal clear for me.

I understand in case of vgic_its_cmd_handle_invall you want to avoid
doing an invalidation for each physical irq but rather do an
its_invall_vpe at the end. So you add a new  @needs_inv arg to
update_lpi_config to tell whether the invalidation should be done or not.

Besides

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>

Thanks

Eric

> 
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cd...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 2e77c7c83942..eb72eb027060 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static int vgic_its_save_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
>  static int vgic_its_restore_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
>  static int vgic_its_commit_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
>  static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> -                          struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu);
> +                          struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv);
>  
>  /*
>   * Creates a new (reference to a) struct vgic_irq for a given LPI.
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 
> intid,
>        * However we only have those structs for mapped IRQs, so we read in
>        * the respective config data from memory here upon mapping the LPI.
>        */
> -     ret = update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, NULL);
> +     ret = update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, NULL, false);
>       if (ret)
>               return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static struct its_collection *find_collection(struct 
> vgic_its *its, int coll_id)
>   * VCPU. Unconditionally applies if filter_vcpu is NULL.
>   */
>  static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> -                          struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu)
> +                          struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv)
>  {
>       u64 propbase = GICR_PROPBASER_ADDRESS(kvm->arch.vgic.propbaser);
>       u8 prop;
> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
> vgic_irq *irq,
>       }
>  
>       if (irq->hw)
> -             return its_prop_update_vlpi(irq->host_irq, prop, true);
> +             return its_prop_update_vlpi(irq->host_irq, prop, needs_inv);
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_inv(struct kvm *kvm, 
> struct vgic_its *its,
>       if (!ite)
>               return E_ITS_INV_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
>  
> -     return update_lpi_config(kvm, ite->irq, NULL);
> +     return update_lpi_config(kvm, ite->irq, NULL, true);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1131,12 +1131,15 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_invall(struct kvm 
> *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
>               irq = vgic_get_irq(kvm, NULL, intids[i]);
>               if (!irq)
>                       continue;
> -             update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, vcpu);
> +             update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, vcpu, false);
>               vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
>       }
>  
>       kfree(intids);
>  
> +     if (vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe.its_vm)
> +             its_invall_vpe(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe);
> +
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> 

Reply via email to