Hi Bart
Thanks for your kindly response and directive.
On 03/03/2018 12:31 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 11:31 +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> index a86df9c..d2f1838 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
>> @@ -191,7 +191,13 @@ static void __scsi_queue_insert(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
>> int reason, bool unbusy)
>> */
>> cmd->result = 0;
>> if (q->mq_ops) {
>> - scsi_mq_requeue_cmd(cmd);
>> + /*
>> + * scsi_device.sdev_gendev will be get every time in
>> .get_budget and
>> + * be put in scsi_end_request. Hence we need to put the
>> reference
>> + * here when we decide to requeue request.
>> + */
>> + blk_mq_requeue_request(cmd->request, true);
>> + put_device(&device->sdev_gendev);
>> return;
>> }
>> spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
>
> Please consider to change the new comment into something like the following:
> "Before a SCSI command is dispatched, get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev) is called
> and the host, target and device busy counters are increased. Since requeuing a
> request causes these actions to be repeated and since scsi_device_unbusy() has
> already been called, put_device(&device->sdev_gendev) must still be called.
> Call
> put_device() after blk_mq_requeue_request() to avoid that removal of the SCSI
> device can start before requeueing has happened."
Yes, your comment is more detailed and clearly.
Sincerely
Jianchao
