On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 10:47:30AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018-08-03 10:19, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > Use dmaenginem_async_device_register to simplify the code:
> >    remove dma_async_device_unregister
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <sjhu...@iluvatar.ai>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dma/ti/omap-dma.c | 5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/omap-dma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/omap-dma.c
> > index a4a931ddf6f6..085748c6eb67 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/ti/omap-dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/omap-dma.c
> > @@ -1566,7 +1566,7 @@ static int omap_dma_probe(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev)
> >             }
> >     }
> >  
> > -   rc = dma_async_device_register(&od->ddev);
> > +   rc = dmaenginem_async_device_register(&od->ddev);
> 
> Why it is dmaenginem_async_device_register() and not aligned other
> resource managed functions (devm_* dmam_*), like
> devm_dma_async_device_register()
Vinod prefer the this dmaenginem_async_device_register..        
> 
> and in dmaenginem_async_device_register() what is the 'm' in dmaenginem ?
> DMAengine Managed?
Yes.
> 
> >     if (rc) {
> >             pr_warn("OMAP-DMA: failed to register slave DMA engine device: 
> > %d\n",
> >                     rc);
> > @@ -1584,7 +1584,6 @@ static int omap_dma_probe(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev)
> >                             of_dma_simple_xlate, &omap_dma_info);
> >             if (rc) {
> >                     pr_warn("OMAP-DMA: failed to register DMA 
> > controller\n");
> > -                   dma_async_device_unregister(&od->ddev);
> >                     omap_dma_free(od);
> >             }
> >     }
> > @@ -1606,8 +1605,6 @@ static int omap_dma_remove(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev)
> >     irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> >     devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, od);
> >  
> > -   dma_async_device_unregister(&od->ddev);
> > -
> 
> I think this is a bad idea in general.
> We need to unregister the dma-device before we clean up and free resources.
okay, thanks for pointing here.
We can drop this patch now...

> 
> >     if (!od->legacy) {
> >             /* Disable all interrupts */
> >             omap_dma_glbl_write(od, IRQENABLE_L0, 0);
> > 
> 
> I'm sorry to say, but it is a NACK from me.
No problem.

Thanks
Huang Shijie

Reply via email to