Hi Peter,

On 26/07/19 16:54, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bris...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.ab...@santannapisa.it>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched/sysctl.h |    3 +++
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c      |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/sysctl.c              |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/sysctl.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ int sched_proc_update_handler(struct ctl
>  extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_rt_period;
>  extern int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime;
>  
> +extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_max;
> +extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_min;
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
>  extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min;
>  extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max;
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2597,6 +2597,14 @@ void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * Default limits for DL period; on the top end we guard against small util
> + * tasks still getting rediculous long effective runtimes, on the bottom end 
> we
> + * guard against timer DoS.
> + */
> +unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_max = 1 << 22; /* ~4 seconds */
> +unsigned int sysctl_sched_dl_period_min = 100;     /* 100 us */
> +
> +/*
>   * This function validates the new parameters of a -deadline task.
>   * We ask for the deadline not being zero, and greater or equal
>   * than the runtime, as well as the period of being zero or
> @@ -2608,6 +2616,8 @@ void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p
>   */
>  bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
>  {
> +     u64 period, max, min;
> +
>       /* special dl tasks don't actually use any parameter */
>       if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV)
>               return true;
> @@ -2631,12 +2641,21 @@ bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_
>           attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63))
>               return false;
>  
> +     period = attr->sched_period;
> +     if (!period)
> +             period = attr->sched_deadline;
> +
>       /* runtime <= deadline <= period (if period != 0) */
> -     if ((attr->sched_period != 0 &&
> -          attr->sched_period < attr->sched_deadline) ||
> +     if (period < attr->sched_deadline ||
>           attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime)
>               return false;
>  
> +     max = (u64)READ_ONCE(sysctl_sched_dl_period_max) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +     min = (u64)READ_ONCE(sysctl_sched_dl_period_min) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +
> +     if (period < min || period > max)
> +             return false;
> +
>       return true;
>  }
>  
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -443,6 +443,20 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
>               .proc_handler   = sched_rt_handler,
>       },
>       {
> +             .procname       = "sched_deadline_period_max_us",
> +             .data           = &sysctl_sched_dl_period_max,
> +             .maxlen         = sizeof(unsigned int),
> +             .mode           = 0644,
> +             .proc_handler   = proc_dointvec,
> +     },
> +     {
> +             .procname       = "sched_deadline_period_min_us",
> +             .data           = &sysctl_sched_dl_period_min,
> +             .maxlen         = sizeof(unsigned int),
> +             .mode           = 0644,
> +             .proc_handler   = proc_dointvec,
> +     },
> +     {
>               .procname       = "sched_rr_timeslice_ms",
>               .data           = &sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice,
>               .maxlen         = sizeof(int),

I think this never made it upstream. And I believe both me and Daniel
were OK with it. Do you recall if any additional change was needed?

Thanks,

Juri

Reply via email to