On 02/07/20 16:32, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:59:59AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > > On 02/07/20 01:20, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 06:35:04PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > > Guess you might be faster to understand what I'm missing. :-) > > > > > > So, did you port only this patch or the whole set in order to > > > trigger this? > > > > > > If it was the whole set, can you try this patch alone? > > > > Whole set. And I can't reproduce if I try with this patch alone. > > > > Missing initialization. This should go better after this: > > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c > index 25a55c043297..f36b53219768 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/timer.c > +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c > @@ -1969,6 +1969,7 @@ static void __init init_timer_cpu(int cpu) > base->cpu = cpu; > raw_spin_lock_init(&base->lock); > base->clk = jiffies; > + base->next_expiry = base->clk + NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA; > timer_base_init_expiry_lock(base); > } > } >
Yep. Looks like warning is gone.
