Hi Jacopo,

On 16/02/2021 17:41, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> When the device is identified the driver currently reports the
> names of the chips embedded in the camera module.
> 
> Report the name of the camera module itself instead.
> Cosmetic change only.

Aha, there go all my scripts that rely on this string to know if the
camera was found ... but I can fix that ;-)

Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+rene...@ideasonboard.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+rene...@jmondi.org>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> index 6504ed0bd3bc..56406d82b5ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int rdacm20_initialize(struct rdacm20_device *dev)
>       if (ret)
>               return ret;
>  
> -     dev_info(dev->dev, "Identified MAX9271 + OV10635 device\n");
> +     dev_info(dev->dev, "Identified RDACM20 camera module\n");
>  
>       /*
>        * Set reverse channel high threshold to increase noise immunity.
> 

Reply via email to