On 12-03-21, 01:09, Frank Rowand wrote: > I suggested having the .dtso files include the .dts file because that is a > relatively > small and easy change to test. What would probably make more sense is the > rename > the existing overlay .dts files to be .dtso files and then for each overlay > .dtso > file create a new .dts file that #includes the corresponding .dtso file. > This is > more work and churn, but easier to document that the .dts files are a hack > that is > needed so that the corresponding .dtb.S files will be generated.
What about creating links instead then ? -- viresh
