On 18-03-21, 15:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Allowing multiple virtio-i2c controllers in one system, and multiple i2c > devices attached to each controller is clearly something that has to work.
Good. > I don't actually see a limitation though. Viresh, what is the problem > you see for having multiple controllers? I thought this would be a problem in that case as we are using the global virtio_adapter here. + vi->adap = &virtio_adapter; + i2c_set_adapdata(vi->adap, vi); Multiple calls to probe() will end up updating the same pointer inside adap. + vi->adap->dev.parent = &vdev->dev; Same here, overwrite. + /* Setup ACPI node for controlled devices which will be probed through ACPI */ + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&vi->adap->dev, ACPI_COMPANION(pdev)); + vi->adap->timeout = HZ / 10; These may be fine, but still not ideal I believe. + ret = i2c_add_adapter(vi->adap); i This should be a problem as well, we must be adding this to some sort of list, doing some RPM stuff, etc ? Jie, the solution is to allocate memory for adap at runtime in probe and remove the virtio_adapter structure completely. -- viresh
