Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On 9/14/23 00:03, Chen Ni wrote:
[snip]
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> > index 1b9f5b8a6167..5765674b36f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> > @@ -30,7 +30,13 @@ static int of_pmem_region_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > if (!priv)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - priv->bus_desc.provider_name = kstrdup(pdev->name, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + priv->bus_desc.provider_name = devm_kstrdup(&pdev->dev, pdev->name,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!priv->bus_desc.provider_name) {
> > + kfree(priv);
>
> I wonder if priv should be allocated with devm_kzalloc() instead to reduce
> the resource management burden.
I think it could be but this is the driver and I wonder if leaving the
allocation around until the platform device goes away was undesirable for
some reason?
Ira
