On 12/12/2023 7:55 PM, Chukun Pan wrote:
> The tcsr_mutex hwlock register of the ipq6018 SoC is 0x20000[1], which
> should not use the max_register configuration of older SoCs. This will
> cause smem to be unable to probe, further causing devices that use
> smem-part to parse partitions to fail to boot.
>
> [ 2.118227] qcom-smem: probe of 4aa00000.memory failed with error -110
> [ 22.273120] platform 79b0000.nand-controller: deferred probe pending
>
> Remove 'qcom,ipq6018-tcsr-mutex' setting from of_match to fix this.
Hi Chukun,
This patch was already posted [2] and Bjorn applied the same [3].
Hi Bjorn,
This patch is missing in linux-next. Could you please help check ?
Thanks,
Vignesh
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230905095535.1263113-3-quic_viswa...@quicinc.com/
[3]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/169522934567.2501390.1112201061322984444.b4...@kernel.org/
>
> [1] commit 72fc3d58b87b ("arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: Fix tcsr_mutex register
> size")
> Fixes: 5d4753f741d8 ("hwspinlock: qcom: add support for MMIO on older SoCs")
> Signed-off-by: Chukun Pan <amad...@jmu.edu.cn>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> index a0fd67fd2934..814dfe8697bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> qcom_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex", .data = &of_sfpb_mutex },
> { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex", .data = &of_tcsr_mutex },
> { .compatible = "qcom,apq8084-tcsr-mutex", .data =
> &of_msm8226_tcsr_mutex },
> - { .compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-tcsr-mutex", .data =
> &of_msm8226_tcsr_mutex },
> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8226-tcsr-mutex", .data =
> &of_msm8226_tcsr_mutex },
> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-tcsr-mutex", .data =
> &of_msm8226_tcsr_mutex },
> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8994-tcsr-mutex", .data =
> &of_msm8226_tcsr_mutex },
