Ira Weiny wrote: [..] > > As Steve said, tp_printk is a hack (a very useful one) and > > hopefully no one runs it in production. > > OMG... I did not realize what tp_printk() was exactly. I should have > looked closer. > > Do we have evidence of its use in production? > > I would love to not have to revert/respin,
The revert is for 2 non-trivial fixes needed in one new feature, lets just circle back and get it right for v6.9. The tp_printk() was not the final straw for me.
