Hi Srikar,

On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:55:21 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> [2013-11-27 15:19:49]:
>>  /**
>>   * Kprobe event core functions
>>   */
>> -struct trace_probe {
>> +struct trace_kprobe {
>>      struct list_head        list;
>>      struct kretprobe        rp;     /* Use rp.kp for kprobe use */
>>      unsigned long           nhit;
>> -    unsigned int            flags;  /* For TP_FLAG_* */
>>      const char              *symbol;        /* symbol name */
>> -    struct ftrace_event_class       class;
>> -    struct ftrace_event_call        call;
>> -    struct list_head        files;
>> -    ssize_t                 size;           /* trace entry size */
>> -    unsigned int            nr_args;
>> -    struct probe_arg        args[];
>> +    struct trace_probe      p;
>
> Can I suggest to use tp instead of p to denote trace_probe?

Sure.  I'll change it.

>
>>  };
>> 
>> 
>
> <..snipped..>
>
>> -static int register_probe_event(struct trace_probe *tp);
>> -static int unregister_probe_event(struct trace_probe *tp);
>> +static int register_kprobe_event(struct trace_kprobe *tk);
>> +static int unregister_kprobe_event(struct trace_kprobe *tk);
>> 
>>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(probe_lock);
>>  static LIST_HEAD(probe_list);
>> @@ -107,14 +91,14 @@ static int kretprobe_dispatcher(struct 
>> kretprobe_instance *ri,
>>  /*
>>   * Allocate new trace_probe and initialize it (including kprobes).
>>   */
>> -static struct trace_probe *alloc_trace_probe(const char *group,
>> +static struct trace_kprobe *alloc_trace_kprobe(const char *group,
>>                                           const char *event,
>>                                           void *addr,
>>                                           const char *symbol,
>>                                           unsigned long offs,
>>                                           int nargs, bool is_return)
>>  {
>> -    struct trace_probe *tp;
>> +    struct trace_kprobe *tp;
>
> Nit: Here and couple of places below: Given that tk was used to
> represent trace_kprobe, can we use tk everywhere. Using tp to represent
> trace_probe and trace_kprobe is a bit confusing.

Right.  I did it because changing it to 'tk' leads to many oneline hunks
here and there so I worried it might disturb reviewers.

But yeah, I also dislike it.  I'll change it to have consistent names.

>
>>      int ret = -ENOMEM;
>> 
>
> The rest looks fine.

Thanks for your review!
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to