Dear Felipe Balbi,

On Wed, 7 May 2014 10:10:08 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:

> > ifneq ($(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_MVEBU), )
> >     xhci-hcd-y += xhci-mvebu.o
> > endif
> > 
> > Right?
> 
> correct :-)
> 
> > If so, then what about instead making CONFIG_USB_XHCI_MVEBU a bool
> > instead of a tristate? It's more an option for the xhci-platform
> > driver than an additional separate module, IMO. What do you think?
> 
> fine by me too. It simply adds a quirk callback to xhci-plat.

In the end, I settled on keeping the tristate, and used your
suggestion. Because since xhci-plat itself is a blind option, and
xhci-mvebu selects it, if xhci-mvebu is a bool, there would no longer
be a way to have xhci-plat as a module. At least that's my
understanding of the kconfig stuff :)

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to