Hi, Baolin Wang <baolin.w...@linaro.org> writes: >> Baolin Wang <baolin.w...@linaro.org> writes: >>>> Can't you just tie a charger to a UDC and avoid the charger class >>>> completely? >>> >>> Yeah, I also hope so. But we really want something to manage the >>> charger devices, do you have any good suggestion to avoid the 'class' >>> but also can manage the charger devices? >> >> manage in what way? It seems to me that they don't need to be real >> devices, just a handle as part of struct usb_gadget, no? > > Although charger device is not one real hardware device, we also use > one 'struct device' to describe it in charger.c file. So we should > manage the 'struct device' with one proper way.
that's fine, but why do you think they need a struct device to start with? -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
