On 10 November 2021 at 08:09 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
HI all,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:41:06 +0000,
Bjorn Helgaas <helg...@kernel.org> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:07:24PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
On 09 November 2021 at 03:45 pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hello,
The Nemo board [1] doesn't recognize any ATA disks with the pci-v5.16
updates [2].
Error messages:
ata4.00: gc timeout cmd 0xec
ata4.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, error_mask=0x4)
ata1.00: gc timeout cmd 0xec
ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, error_mask=0x4)
ata3.00: gc timeout cmd 0xec
ata3.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, error_mask=0x4)
I was able to revert the new pci-v5.16 updates [2]. After a new
compiling, the kernel recognize all ATA disks correctly.
Could you please check the pci-v5.16 updates [2]?
Please find attached the kernel config.
Thanks,
Christian
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AmigaOne_X1000
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0c5c62ddf88c34bc83b66e4ac9beb2bb0e1887d4
Hi All,
Many thanks for your nice responses.
I bisected today [1]. 0412841812265734c306ba5ef8088bcb64d5d3bd (of/irq:
Allow matching of an interrupt-map local to an interrupt controller) [2] is
the first bad commit.
I was able to revert the first bad commit [1]. After a new compiling, the
kernel detects all ATA disks without any problems.
I created a patch for an easy reverting the bad commit [1]. With this patch
we can do further our kernel tests.
Could you please check the first bad commit [2]?
Thanks,
Christian
[1] https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?p=54398#p54398
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0412841812265734c306ba5ef8088bcb64d5d3bd
[+ Marc Zyngier, Alyssa Rosenzweig, Lorenzo Pieralisi, and Rob Herring
because of the first bad commit]
Thank you very much for the bisection and for also testing the revert!
It's easy enough to revert 041284181226 ("of/irq: Allow matching of an
interrupt-map local to an interrupt controller"), and it seems like
that's what we need to do. I have it tentatively queued up.
That commit was part of the new support for the Apple M1 PCIe
interface, and I don't know what effect a revert will have on that
support. Marc, Alyssa?
It is going to badly break the M1 support, as we won't be able to take
interrupts to detect that the PCIe link is up.
Before we apply a full blown revert and decide that this isn't
workable (and revert the whole M1 PCIe series, because they are
otherwise somewhat pointless), I'd like to understand *what* breaks
exactly.
Christian, could you point me to the full DT that this machine uses?
This would help understanding what goes wrong, and cook something for
you to test.
Thanks,
M.
Hello Marc,
Here you are:
https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?p=54406#p54406
We are very happy to have the patch for reverting the bad commit because
we want to test the new PASEMI i2c driver with support for the Apple M1
[1] on our Nemo boards.
Thanks for your help,
Christian
[1] https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?p=54086#p54086
