also sprach Frédéric Brière <fbri...@fbriere.net> [2009.07.18.1322 +0200]: > Indeed, it wasn't. What I'm saying is that every rule in workstation > was *copied* into server, which doesn't make a lot of sense. Now you've > got 130+ sets of duplicate rules, which are not identical to boot, since > some changes were applied to server but not to workstation.
I definitely didn't want that, nor do I think I did that. I copied violations.ignore.d/logcheck-kernel to ignore.d.server/kernel, and due to the nature of how violations and normal filters interacted, violations.ignore.d had a lot of duplications. > Did you truly mean to copy those rules? I don't mind giving you > a hand in rooting them out, but we'd have to agree on the problem > first. I think any such time would be better invested in implementing template support; without that, any strive to remove redundancy would just be silly, I think. Hint hint. :) -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "nothing can cure the soul but the senses, just as nothing can cure the senses but the soul." -- oscar wilde
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list Logcheck-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel