Again, it's probably not be the wrong approach, it's just what I've been told on this thread:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/2016-06/msg00055.html Since it worked for me at that moment, I just let it like that, and reading the responses here confirms that it's the correct approach if you don't want to wait for the delay. Mihai On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Jakub Schmidtke <sja...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you might have missed reading the documentation: tcp_write enqueue >> data, tcp_outout tries to send it. You always have to call both. >> >> I actually found the recommended call flow on wiki (Here: > http://lwip.wikia.com/wiki/Raw/TCP ) after Mihai mentioned using > tcp_output(). > And yes, I haven't fully read the docs/wiki yet, since I am trying to fix > existing code written by someone else - who must have missed that... > > However, Mihai mentions that calling tcp_output() might be the wrong > approach... Is it really? > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > lwip-users@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
