Oh, so that's why it's so difficult to use bibtex. Hmm, I think then you've just convinced me that systemd's approach is better :-)
On 17 September 2014 15:42, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 09/15/2014 12:39 PM, José Matos wrote: >> >> While the above piece >> >> http://www.itwire.com/business-it-news/open-source/65402-torvalds-says-he-has-no-strong-opinions-on-systemd >> >> I noticed that Linus refers to LyX in the context of the unix way: >> >> "And systemd is in no way the piece that breaks with old UNIX legacy. >> Graphical applications seldom worked that way (there are certainly _echoes_ >> of it in things like "LyX", but I think it's the exception rather than the >> rule)..." >> >> Funny and interesting to read at the same time. :-) > > > Nice to see that we are on his radar somehow. And of course he's right. This > value gets invoked here from time to time. No BibTeX editor as part of LyX, > e.g. > > Richard >
