You could try DumpHTML and then have a chron task to copy the selected outputs to a area where areas can access them
On 30 December 2017 at 09:40, Bryan Hilderbrand <bry...@tegnosis.wiki> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for all the responses. I suppose I'll try the Collection extension > for now unless someone knows of a slick solution. > > Martin, I agree about a Wiki not being a CMS and I'm not thrilled to be > trying to limit access, but it's only a really small subset of the > articles. I am running MW1.28 though, so it appears the Lockdown extension > isn't available to me (it has been updated to show unmaintained vs. stable > now, I'm guessing after someone read this thread). > > Chris and John, I've found it to actually be a blessing that it isn't > straightforward to provide discrete access control in an enterprise Wiki. > If it were easy, what would the ideal lockdown strategy be? Engineering > might propose one, R&D another, marketing a third. The fact that in > general, for a private enterprise Wiki, everyone has to use the same "silo > of information" ends up being a huge win for the company. At least in my > experience :) > > Thanks again! > Bryan > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 5:05 PM, kghbln <mediaw...@kghoffmeyer.de> wrote: > >> Yes, but the info box also states 1.23 - 1.26. So there is a version >> constraint for stable. This is however just a side note. >> >> I believe the extension as such is "fixed" now however MediaWiki core >> has an issue since REL1_27 that makes it not working at a 100 percent. >> I am on my knees begging for a fix for a year now. However I am one of >> the very few so there is no real "pressure" apart from the fact that it >> is among the most popular extensions. Toi, toi, toi ... Sadly I am not >> able to propose a change-set myself since I lack the knowledge to do >> so. >> >> Do not get me wrong: A) If one needs 100% only a separate wiki instance >> will help. B) Lockdown already covers a lot in most use cases in an >> acceptable manner so A was not required in most cases I have >> encountered so far. >> >> Cheers Karsten >> >> >> Am Dienstag, den 26.12.2017, 22:42 +0000 schrieb Martin Urbanec: >> > Heff, ok, thanks then. It is propagated as "stable" at it's MediaWiki >> > page... >> > >> > Martin >> > >> > út 26. 12. 2017 v 23:39 odesílatel chris tharp <tharpena...@gmail.com >> > > >> > napsal: >> > >> > > >> > > Martin, >> > > >> > > A quick note: The Lockdown extension has not worked since Mediawiki >> > > 1.26. >> > > If I’m not mistaken almost all the access restriction extensions no >> > > longer >> > > work (several of the older extensions, like Lockdown & SemanticACL, >> > > were >> > > good at access restrictions). The philosophy that a wiki must be >> > > totally >> > > open, regardless of the needs of many, especially Enterprise users, >> > > seems >> > > to have a firm hold on the mind-set of Mediawiki developers. >> > > >> > > Sent from my iPad >> > > >> > > > >> > > > On Dec 26, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Martin Urbanec <martin.urbanec@wikim >> > > > edia.cz> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Just a note, because it may not be clear from what I written >> > > > above. This >> > > > will require a) having the shared content public b) having the >> > > > external >> > > > users accounts on the wiki. I beleive that you was asked for >> > > > account-removing because they should not have access to the >> > > > entrie wiki, >> > > > but only to limited subset of pages. The extension Lockdown >> > > > allows you to >> > > > accomplish such thing. >> > > > >> > > > Martin >> > > > >> > > > út 26. 12. 2017 v 23:17 odesílatel Martin Urbanec < >> > > > martin.urba...@wikimedia.cz> napsal: >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hello, >> > > > > >> > > > > just a info: MediaWiki is not a CMS but a Wiki. This may be not >> > > > > 100% >> > > > > secure but it should work. You may want to have a look at >> > > > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Lockdown . >> > > > > >> > > > > Best, >> > > > > Martin Urbanec >> > > > > (cs.wikipedia) >> > > > > >> > > > > út 26. 12. 2017 v 22:39 odesílatel Bryan Hilderbrand >> > > <bry...@tegnosis.wiki> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > napsal: >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I have a question that may be similar to G. Moko's post on >> > > > > > December >> > > 19th >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > regarding "Dump of Recent Changes". >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I have a private enterprise wiki that currently has some >> > > > > > external users >> > > > > > that have been granted read-only access. I have been asked to >> > > > > > remove >> > > these >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > external users from the wiki, but they need access to some of >> > > > > > the >> > > content. >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > What is the best way to handle this? Extensions? Separate >> > > > > > wiki that >> > > > > > automatically updates from the main using dumps (like G. >> > > > > > Moko's post) >> > > and >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > some filtering (flagged pages, etc.)? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm considering adding the collection extension [1]. The >> > > > > > content that >> > > > > > needs >> > > > > > to be shared could be added and maintained by the collection >> > > > > > and >> > > > > > daily/weekly pdf books could be distributed (possibly via >> > > > > > Dropbox). >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I welcome any thoughts on or suggestions. Thanks! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Regards, >> > > > > > Bryan >> > > > > > >> > > > > > [1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Collection >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > > MediaWiki-l mailing list >> > > > > > To unsubscribe, go to: >> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l >> > > > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > MediaWiki-l mailing list >> > > > To unsubscribe, go to: >> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > MediaWiki-l mailing list >> > > To unsubscribe, go to: >> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > MediaWiki-l mailing list >> > To unsubscribe, go to: >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MediaWiki-l mailing list >> To unsubscribe, go to: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l >> > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > To unsubscribe, go to: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list To unsubscribe, go to: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
