On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 2:20 PM Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/29/19 2:15 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 2:11 PM Samuel Pitoiset
> > <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The HTILE masks seem to be different and so we need to rework that
> >> path. Just disabled for now and implement later.
> > The HTILE masks are not different per amdvlk?
> >
> > Can you at least rework the commit message to reflect that?
> "It needs to be reworked on GFX10, so just disable it for now." ?

How about just "It causes issues on GFX10"? We don't know it needs to
be reworked either?


> >> This fixes rendering issues with vkmark and Wreckfest at least.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>   src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c | 5 +++--
> >>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c 
> >> b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c
> >> index b93ba3e0b29..8ddc2e38cd4 100644
> >> --- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c
> >> +++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c
> >> @@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ radv_can_fast_clear_depth(struct radv_cmd_buffer 
> >> *cmd_buffer,
> >>          if (!view_mask && clear_rect->layerCount != 
> >> iview->image->info.array_size)
> >>                  return false;
> >>
> >> -       if (cmd_buffer->device->physical_device->rad_info.chip_class < 
> >> GFX9 &&
> >> +       if (cmd_buffer->device->physical_device->rad_info.chip_class != 
> >> GFX9 &&
> >>              (!(aspects & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT) ||
> >>              ((vk_format_aspects(iview->image->vk_format) & 
> >> VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT) &&
> >>               !(aspects & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT))))
> >> @@ -1048,7 +1048,8 @@ radv_fast_clear_depth(struct radv_cmd_buffer 
> >> *cmd_buffer,
> >>                                                
> >> iview->image->planes[0].surface.htile_size, clear_word);
> >>          } else {
> >>                  /* Only clear depth or stencil bytes in the HTILE buffer. 
> >> */
> >> -               
> >> assert(cmd_buffer->device->physical_device->rad_info.chip_class >= GFX9);
> >> +               /* TODO: Implement that path for GFX10. */
> >> +               
> >> assert(cmd_buffer->device->physical_device->rad_info.chip_class == GFX9);
> >>                  flush_bits = clear_htile_mask(cmd_buffer, 
> >> iview->image->bo,
> >>                                                iview->image->offset + 
> >> iview->image->htile_offset,
> >>                                                
> >> iview->image->planes[0].surface.htile_size, clear_word,
> >> --
> >> 2.22.0
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mesa-dev mailing list
> >> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to