kami petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jan Johansson skrev: > >kami petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>well, it should work. however, you should set an address on either of > >>the interfaces that constitutes the bridge, not the bridge itself. > >> > >>but you don't say exactly where you are unsuccessful... > > > >It works, I just thought there might be a cleaner solution. > > > >For example both ral0 and fxp1 needs an IP address or dhcpd just > >refuses to work on the interface. > > on the router: assign 192.168.13.1 to fxp1 and none to ral0, put both > fxp1 and ral0 in the bridge, putting both ral0 and fxp1 in > dhcpd.interfaces. a similar solution is working here.
I started over and this time I got it working with an address only on ral0 and dhcpd listening only on ral0. (I think the paket filter and stupid Windows XP was the problem the first time). Thanks for the help.
