Raffaello Giulietti wrote: > Christian Thalinger wrote: >> Raffaello Giulietti wrote: >>> * Is there a special -XX: flag to turn on inlining of methods invoked >>> via method handles? >>> * Or must something be enabled during the build of mlvm? >> No, inlining is enabled by default. Currently only DMH invokes are >> inlined, but I'm working on inlining the rest. Are you missing specific >> calls? >> > > I'm experimenting with the implementation of a Smalltalk-like language. > I'm using invokedynamic that targets a trivial stub that dispatches over > the receiver's type which finally invokes a DMH. > > A simple test shows a factor of 150-200 with respect to an ordinary > invokevirtual. That is, my Smalltalkish method invocation > implementation, although seemingly trivial, is about 2 orders of > magnitudes slower than Java's :-( That's why I'm wondering if inlining > is at work.
Is it publicly available and easy to set up so I can give it a shot? -- Christian _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
