On Jun 5, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > OH, and FWIW, here's the LogCompilation -i output roughly around where > I'd expect to see op_plus and op_lt inlining: > > @ 27 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeExact (0 bytes) > @ 27 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeExact (17 bytes) > @ 10 org.jruby.RubyFixnum::op_plus (38 bytes) > @ 45 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeExact (0 bytes) > @ 45 java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeExact (17 bytes) > @ 10 org.jruby.RubyFixnum::op_lt (22 bytes) > > Is it lying, or what? And if it's actually inlining, where's the rest > of op_plus and op_lt, most of which is trivial tiny methods? And why > doesn't it show up as inlined in the assembly output?
That's interesting. Maybe there is a problem with the method handle compiler which bails out and stops inlining. I have to look into that myself. -- Christian _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
