This might be an interesting example of it's (mis)use.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_wiretapping_case_2004%E2%80%932005
Sam Moats
On 2013-12-30 11:16, Enno Rey wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 04:03:07PM +0000, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:44 PM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu>
<valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote:
> What percentage of Cisco gear that supports a CALEA lawful
intercept mode is installed in situations where CALEA doesn't apply,
and thus there's a high likelyhood that said support is misconfigured
and abusable without being noticed?
AFAIK, it must be explicitly enabled in order to be functional. It
isn't the sort of thing which is enabled by default, nor can it be
enabled without making explicit configuration changes.
at least back in 2007 it could be enabled/configured by SNMP RW
access [see slide 43 of the presentation referenced in this post
http://www.insinuator.net/2013/07/snmp-reflected-amplification-ddos-attacks/]
so knowing the term "private" m
ight be enough to perform the task remotely.
have a good one
Enno
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> //
<http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
