On 2021/4/14 1:18, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:17:00 +0800 Huazhong Tan wrote:+static void hclge_push_link_status(struct hclge_dev *hdev) +{ + struct hclge_vport *vport; + int ret; + u16 i; + + for (i = 0; i < pci_num_vf(hdev->pdev); i++) { + vport = &hdev->vport[i + HCLGE_VF_VPORT_START_NUM]; + + if (!test_bit(HCLGE_VPORT_STATE_ALIVE, &vport->state) || + vport->vf_info.link_state != IFLA_VF_LINK_STATE_AUTO) + continue; + + ret = hclge_push_vf_link_status(vport); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev, + "failed to push link status to vf%u, ret = %d\n", + i, ret);Isn't this error printed twice? Here and...
They are in different contexts. here will be called to update the link status of all VFs when the underlying link status is changed, while the below one is called when the admin set up the specific VF link status. Thanks.
+} + static void hclge_update_link_status(struct hclge_dev *hdev) { struct hnae3_handle *rhandle = &hdev->vport[0].roce; @@ -3246,14 +3269,24 @@ static int hclge_set_vf_link_state(struct hnae3_handle *handle, int vf, { struct hclge_vport *vport = hclge_get_vport(handle); struct hclge_dev *hdev = vport->back; + int link_state_old; + int ret;vport = hclge_get_vf_vport(hdev, vf);if (!vport) return -EINVAL;+ link_state_old = vport->vf_info.link_state;vport->vf_info.link_state = link_state;- return 0;+ ret = hclge_push_vf_link_status(vport); + if (ret) { + vport->vf_info.link_state = link_state_old; + dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev, + "failed to push vf%d link status, ret = %d\n", vf, ret); + }... here? Otherwise the patches LGTM. .
