Apple votes YES on Ballot NS-003.

> On Apr 23, 2024, at 8:59 AM, Clint Wilson via Netsec <netsec@cabforum.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Ballot NS-003 is proposed by Clint Wilson of Apple and endorsed by Trevoli 
> Ponds-White of Amazon and David Kluge of Google Trust Services.
> 
> Purpose of Ballot
> 
> This ballot proposes a comprehensive restructuring of the Network and 
> Certificate System Security Requirements (NCSSRs), excepting Section 4. The 
> current structure of the document has proven to be challenging for creating 
> ballots, contains duplicated requirements, and separates similar requirements 
> across the document. These issues have led to inefficiencies in managing and 
> implementing security standards. Therefore, this proposal aims to streamline 
> the document's structure, eliminate redundancies, improve comprehensibility, 
> and enhance clarity and coherence.
> 
> Reasons for Proposal:
> 
> Complexity in Ballot Creation: The current document structure can make it 
> difficult to create and manage ballots efficiently, leading to somewhat 
> awkward updating processes, abandoned ballots, and a lack of confidence that 
> ballots effect the intended changes.
> Redundancy: Over time, some parts of the NCSSRs have touched on the same 
> topic, leading to some duplication across the document and further to 
> confusion and inconsistency in implementation.
> Fragmentation: Similar requirements for different parts of a CA’s 
> NCSSR-relevant infrastructure are scattered throughout the document, making 
> it somewhat more difficult for to locate and comprehend a complete picture of 
> these requirements effectively.
> Minor Issues: The document contains other, more minor issues that also impede 
> its usability and effectiveness, such as missing definitions, unclear list 
> structures, and requirements that are more optional than they may currently 
> appear.
> 
> Benefits of the Updated Document Structure:
> 
> Enhanced Clarity: The revised structure should improve the clarity and 
> coherence of the document, making the requirements it represents easier to 
> understand, as well as result in greater consistency when implementing or 
> assessing its security requirements.
> Future Updates: A more granular document structure should improve the process 
> of creating and managing ballots in the future. Similarly, the improved 
> proximity of related requirements should hopefully aid in identifying the 
> areas the NCSSRs can most benefit from further attention.
> Grouping and De-duplication of Similar Requirements: By consolidating 
> duplicated requirements, the updated document should make it much easier to 
> find, comprehend, assess, and implement related requirements.
> Clearer Recommendations: The updated document includes a number of additional 
> “SHOULD”-type stipulations, clarifying some of the language in the current 
> NCSSRs such that it’s easier to identify where the NCSSRs impose a strict 
> requirement as opposed to a strong recommendation.
> 
> Overall, this ballot proposal seeks to address existing challenges in 
> updating the current version of the NCSSRs and pave the way for future 
> improvements to the NCSSRs.
> 
> MOTION BEGINS
> 
> This ballot modifies the “Network and Certificate System Security 
> Requirements” as follows, based on version 1.7:
> 
> https://github.com/cabforum/netsec/compare/c62a2f88e252de5c79b101fa3c9e9c536388639a...8bd66d27c07e30d1f4d9e6dd57b075bca499bf2e
> 
> MOTION ENDS
> 
> The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
> 
> Discussion Period (14+ days)
> 
> Start Time: 2024-April-09 16:00 UTC
> End Time: 2024-April-23 15:59 UTC
> 
> Voting Period (7 days)
> 
> Start Time: 2024-April-23 16:00 UTC
> End Time: 2024-April-30 16:00 UTC
> _______________________________________________
> Netsec mailing list
> Netsec@cabforum.org
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/netsec

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Netsec mailing list
Netsec@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/netsec

Reply via email to