So, are you saying that I can't install Windows on the slave drive and Linux on the master drive? Sorry for my confusion.
--- | Aaron West | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.trajiklyhip.com --------- Original Message --------- DATE: 05 Oct 2003 19:32:06 -040 From: ed tharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: >On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 19:04, Aaron West wrote: >> Evening all, >> >> Simple question here. I'm getting closer to the point of >> being ready for the 9.1 install but want some opinions. Since >> I'm going to dual boot with Windows 2000 (Windows with use >> a completely different physical hard drive, my current 15GB >> hard drive. Linux will use the new 120GB Maxtor) and Linux, >> I've been trying to determine the order of OS install. >> >> I read somewhere that you should install Windows first before >> you install Linux. I'm going to completely wipe my current >> Windows install in order to start fresh. And then will be >> installing Linux on the new hard drive. Is it the right >> idea to go ahead and get the fresh Windows drive working >> so once the new HD comes in I'll be ready to go? >> >> Thanks!! >> >> >> --- >> | Aaron West >> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> | http://www.trajiklyhip.com >> >M$ wants to see an M$ product on the first sector of the first partition >on the first disk on the first ide chain. win 9x &ME require them to be >on that partition. win2k can sit elsewhere as long as a M$ product is in >that first spot. > > ____________________________________________________________ Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
