In the meantime maybe it's a good idea to keep one of the issues open so that people can see that this is an open issue? As we close them they disappear from the issues tab on Github
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 >> hours: >> >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439 >> >> This has happened before: >> >> https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org/issues/187#issue-186426408 >> >> I think it was down for about 24 hours that time. >> >> From the number of people opening issues or commenting on the >> scipy.org website this time, it seems to be causing quite a bit of >> disruption. >> >> It seems to me that we would have a much better chances of avoiding >> significant down-time, if we switched to hosting the docs on github >> pages. >> >> What do y'all think? >> > > Once the site is back up we should look at migrating to a better (hosted) > infrastructure. I suspect that Github Pages won't work, we'll exceed or be > close to exceeding both the 1 GB site size limit and the 100 GB/month > bandwidth limit [1]. > > Rough bandwidth estimate (using page size from http://scipy.github.io/ > devdocs/ and Alexa stats): 2 million visits per month, 2.5 page views per > visit, 5 kb/page = 25 GB/month (html). Add to that pdf docs, which are ~20 > MB in size: if only a small fraction of visitors download those, we'll be > at >100 GB. > > Ralf > > [1] https://help.github.com/articles/what-is-github-pages/#usage-limits > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
