2011/9/13 Charles Lepple <clep...@gmail.com> > On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > 2011/9/13 Charles Lepple <clep...@gmail.com> >> >> On Sep 12, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: >>>> >>>> (forwarding because of message body too big) >>>> >>>> Author: fbohe-guest >>>> Date: Mon Sep 12 14:50:47 2011 >>>> New Revision: 3214 >>>> URL: >>>> http://trac.networkupstools.**org/projects/nut/changeset/**3214<http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3214> >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> Add nut-scanner tool >>>> >>> >>> >>> Due to the build failures, I recommend we revert this merge commit for >>> 2.6.2, or simply make the branch from one revision prior. >>> >>> http://buildbot.**networkupstools.org/public/** >>> nut/builders/HPUX-x64/builds/**101<http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/HPUX-x64/builds/101> >>> >>> >>> http://buildbot.**networkupstools.org/public/** >>> nut/builders/Solaris-intel/**builds/95<http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Solaris-intel/builds/95> >>> >>> >> I'm more in favor of fixing this, either by disabling the feature through >> configure or actually fixing the failures, since we have a non core >> component. >> >> since Fred made the commit just before leaving yesterday, he will be able >> to >> check and address this today, so in time for 2.6.2. >> > > Since it seems that this is the first time this branch has been compiled on > these two platforms, I can only assume it hasn't been tested there, either. > That doesn't give me much confidence. >
well, looking at the error msg, there is not big issues there (ie none that can't be solved quickly). > Also, I'm not saying the failures can't be fixed - I just think that trying > to fix them on an arbitrarily short timeline is not the right way to > approach the problem. > full ack! though the compromise I wanted to reach was to quickly stabilize the feature while not over-burning buildslaves. the situation should be almost fixed now, apart from the IPv6 / Solaris issue that Fred is currently working on. > I know we don't have automatic builds of branches other than the trunk, but > Buildbot has been available the whole time this branch was being developed. > well, the interesting slaves were offline for more than a week, but it's true that we *must* force a build before having. point taken for the best practices. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list Nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev