Good proposal, makes sense. Sorry for slow replies, I'm now largely offline for a few weeks coming.
Jim On Thu, Aug 12, 2021, 10:55 Roger Price <ro...@rogerprice.org> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser wrote: > > following a 10 days period after my above announcement, I've considered > the > > absence of feedback and comments as an implicit approval. I've hence > merged > > the above PRs, which results in the update of the NUT variables names > and > > instant commands update: > > > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/6d30b8cd190b25cafdbc46f8dc4602fb68692270/docs/nut-names.txt > > I'm wondering if it wouldn't be helpful in the long term if the process > you have > inaugurated were written into the file nut-names.txt Something like: > > Adding names to this file > ========================= > > If you want to add (change or remove) names in this file, then remember > that it > is part of RFC XXXX, and that your action requires the "rough consensus" > due to > an RFC. In practice this means large approval in the NUT mailing list. > Post > your intended change and invite comments. If, after 10 days you have > received > no objections, then you may assume that you have large approval. Make a > second > announcement in the NUT mailing list that you now intend to make the > change. > > Roger > > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser >
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
